06/10/2022

Sangathy

Sangathy

Ex-HR Commissioner moves SC against Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act

2 min read

Former Human Rights Commissioner Ambika Satkunanathan has moved the Supreme Court against the proposed amendment to the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act.

 The petitioner has stated provisions of the proposed amendment are inconsistent with Articles of the Constitution of Sri Lanka prohibiting torture, unequal treatment and arbitrary arrest and detention.

 The Attorney General has been named the respondent.

The petitioner has argued that the proposed amendment denies bail to persons suspected or accused of committing offences under certain sections of the Act until the conclusion of the trial, which is incompatible with fundamental rights protections in the Constitution.

 The petition stated that the proposed amendment allows for de-facto compulsory drug treatment, which has been declared by the United Nations as ineffective and futile and considered to violate several human rights standards, including the right against arbitrary detention, right to be free from torture and the right to the highest attainable standard of medical care.

The proposed amendment empowers police officers to refer a person to undergo a medical test to ascertain “drug dependency” and if the person is found to be dependent on drugs, the officer can refer the person to residential or non-residential drug treatment. The proposed provision hence allows a person to be admitted to residential treatment by a police officer without a judicial order. The petitioner states there is no medical test that can determine drug dependence and further states that empowering a police officer to refer a person to rehabilitation would be liable for abuse and result in the violation of fundamental rights.

Children who are convicted of committing offences under this Bill are also liable for imprisonment for up to ten years according to the proposed amendment. The petitioner highlights that such provisions are contrary to the best interests of the child and will result in the criminalisation of children instead of providing them the required assistance.

 The proposed amendment allows police officers to document and subsequently destroy drugs, prior to the conclusion of the trial, which the petitioner states could potentially adversely impact a person’s right to fair trial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.