Rigging Evidence are in Trump’s Possession, that’s why he was adamant about rigged election
In the 2016 US presidential election, approximately 128.8 million votes were cast. Trump may have expected the total in 2020 to remain in a similar range, perhaps increasing by a few million to around 130 million.
Based on that assumption, Trump might have expected that receiving approximately 74–75 million votes would secure a landslide victory. After all, 75 million votes out of a total of 130 million would represent nearly 58% of all votes cast.
However, the 2020 election produced a very different outcome. Trump received 74,275,926 votes, while Biden received 81,286,454. More importantly, overall turnout increased far beyond the level Trump may have anticipated, reaching well over 150 million votes.
The central argument, therefore, is that Trump’s expectations may have been based on the assumption that the overall vote would remain close to the 2016 total. The unexpectedly high turnout and Biden’s larger vote count fundamentally changed the electoral picture.
Whether this unexpected increase indicates election irregularities is a separate question that requires specific, verifiable evidence. The numerical difference alone does not establish that the election was rigged.
